Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71220

in Bastrop, LouisianaPopulation 20,398

26.71/ 100

Ranked #31,280 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.5%)

Ranked #466 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 8.3%)

Ranked #20 of 24 Monroe, LA ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

8.6%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.0%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.8%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

53.3%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.5%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.9%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.4%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

20.5%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Bastrop, Louisiana (ZIP 71220), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 2.5% nationally (31,280th) and the bottom 8.3% of Louisiana (466th).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled self-care disability registers in the top 1.9% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled vision disability sits in the top 3.4% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the top 2.3% nationally, diabetes resides in the top 2.5% nationally, and fair or poor health is in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the top 2.5% nationally, cognitive disability stands in the top 3.3% nationally, and utility shutoff registers in the top 2.3% nationally.

For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 71203, just across the boundary. Modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 1.3% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Monroe, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.1 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $38,037 predicts 76.3 years — 4.2 years below.

    Ranked #5,177 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.1 ± 1.4 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.0 years — 3.0 years below them.

    Ranked #2,337 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 64.8; chronic-disease standing 3.1 (bottom 10%) — 62 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,606 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.3%32.6–39.9
High blood pressure among adults53.3%48.8–57.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults10.2%9.3–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.8%11.5–14.1
Depression among adults26.9%23.1–30.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.0%18.7–23.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.9%38.3–47.5
Obesity among adults45.4%37.0–53.6
Stroke among adults6.5%6.0–7.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.3%23.1–31.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.4–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.8–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.1–86.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.6–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%58.4–69.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.1%44.2–52.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%69.7–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.2–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.9%21.1–27.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.5%34.4–44.8
Short sleep duration among adults44.9%37.9–52.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.2%30.8–37.7
Frequent mental distress among adults21.4%19.2–23.8
Frequent physical distress among adults19.4%17.3–21.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.4%20.2–24.8
Any disability among adults47.2%42.4–52.0
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–10.8
Independent living disability among adults15.0%13.6–16.5
Mobility disability among adults25.9%23.2–28.6
Self-care disability among adults8.6%7.9–9.3
Vision disability among adults10.8%9.9–11.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.4%29.1–38.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.6%32.1–39.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults34.8%31.7–38.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.0%22.2–27.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.7%15.9–19.6
Loneliness among adults39.8%34.4–45.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults20.5%18.3–22.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate29.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)15.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)8.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle12.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription76.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate67.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households45.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$38,037$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$111,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$859$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.1 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 72.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured