ZIP code
71082
in Vivian, LouisianaPopulation 3,666
21.24/ 100
Ranked #31,793 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 0.9%)
Ranked #500 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 1.6%)
Ranked #37 of 39 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA ZIPs (bottom 5.2%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Self-care disability
9.6%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
17%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
12.0%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Stroke
7.1%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
28.7%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
24.9%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
37.1%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
21.7%
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
12.3%
in the top 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
52.4%
in the top 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›The read
Vivian, Louisiana (ZIP 71082), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 0.9% nationally (31,793rd) and the bottom 1.6% of Louisiana (500th).
The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled self-care disability settles in the top 0.9% nationally, independent living disability registers in the top 1.0% nationally, and vision disability stands in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the top 1.1% nationally, mobility disability is in the top 0.9% nationally, and cognitive disability resides in the top 1.1% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 1.5% nationally, and diabetes lies in the top 1.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease sits in the top 1.4% nationally, and high blood pressure settles in the top 1.7% nationally.
The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 71004, just across the boundary. Modeled stroke settles in the top 1.1% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Shreveport-Bossier City, LA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Healthcare Access
healthier than 73%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 40%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 1%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 1%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 27%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 3%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.3%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 11%
5%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 62%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 63%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 4%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 18%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 21%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 13%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.6%
7%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 54%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 5%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 11%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 30%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 11%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 19%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.00%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
71004
Louisianashares a border
Score 53.34
Closest healthier
71029
Louisianashares a border
Score 43.50
Similar health profile
70526
Louisiana99% similar profile
Score 25.04
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 39.1% | 35.7–42.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 52.4% | 48.6–55.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.8% | 7.9–9.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.6% | 10.2–12.9 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 12.3% | 11.1–13.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 15.9% | 14.1–17.6 |
| Depression among adults | 30.8% | 27.0–34.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 21.7% | 19.3–24.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.4% | 40.3–47.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 46.0% | 40.2–51.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 7.1% | 6.5–7.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 28.1% | 23.9–32.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 11.3% | 9.5–13.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.3% | 79.8–84.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 83.3% | 80.4–85.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 84.3% | 82.2–86.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.9% | 59.1–68.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 48.4% | 44.9–52.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.3% | 67.2–80.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.6% | 11.2–15.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 26.9% | 23.6–30.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 42.3% | 37.6–46.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.4% | 33.5–43.4 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 37.1% | 33.4–40.6 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.8% | 20.4–25.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 22.3% | 19.8–24.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 24.9% | 22.3–27.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 51.1% | 46.7–55.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.4% | 11.1–13.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 17.0% | 15.2–18.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 28.7% | 25.9–31.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 9.6% | 8.7–10.6 |
| Vision disability among adults | 12.0% | 10.9–13.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 30.6% | 26.9–34.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 37.0% | 33.4–40.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 37.2% | 33.6–40.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 24.1% | 21.4–26.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 17.8% | 15.9–19.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 37.9% | 33.5–42.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 20.3% | 18.1–22.6 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | LA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 36.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 17.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 19.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 10.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 10.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 14.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 11.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 16.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 12.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 5.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501 |
| Households without a vehicle | 11.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 6.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504 |
| Broadband subscription | 77.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 23.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504 |
| Homeownership rate | 76.3% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.2% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508 |
| Single-parent households | 61.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495 |
| Population 65+ | 19.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508 |
| Median age | 33.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500 |
| Median household income | $27,616 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457 |
| Median home value | $66,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452 |
| Median gross rent | $739 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $915 ($606–$1,325) n=389 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | LA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 73.7 yr ± 1.28 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 75.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 73.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured