Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70729

in Erwinville, LouisianaPopulation 1,004

35.88/ 100

Ranked #29,054 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.4%)

Ranked #338 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #67 of 83 Baton Rouge, LA ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

49.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.4%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.1%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

146.5 days/year

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.6%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.5%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.2%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Erwinville, Louisiana (ZIP 70729), overall, ranks in the bottom 9.4% nationally (29,054th) and the bottom 33% of Louisiana (338th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled pfas rests in the bottom 5.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 3.1% nationally, fatal road crashes resides in the top 4.0% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 4.5% nationally, and humid heat sits in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 8.4% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled food insecurity stands in the top 8.6% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the top 9.9% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 70736, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baton Rouge, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%30.1–36.2
High blood pressure among adults45.6%42.0–49.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.1%10.0–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%9.6–13.1
Depression among adults28.9%25.6–32.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.9%15.1–19.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%37.0–44.4
Obesity among adults43.3%36.7–50.6
Stroke among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.5%15.9–21.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.9%8.9–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.8–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.3–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults84.4%82.5–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%63.0–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.2%49.8–56.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%69.7–81.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.4–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.0%18.8–25.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.4%29.8–39.4
Short sleep duration among adults40.5%34.7–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.2%25.7–33.4
Frequent mental distress among adults21.1%19.0–23.4
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%16.0–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.4%18.9–24.2
Any disability among adults42.9%38.5–47.8
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.0–14.3
Mobility disability among adults21.3%18.7–24.3
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Vision disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.7%26.1–33.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.1%23.5–31.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.3%20.7–28.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.6%16.2–21.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Loneliness among adults37.0%32.6–41.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.1–15.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6417.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)19.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle7.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription82.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate93.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households47.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+4.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age31.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$109,653$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$300,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured