Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70644

in Grant, LouisianaPopulation 190

40.93/ 100

Ranked #26,085 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #201 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$21,825

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

146.6 days/year

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

13.3 mi

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

33.8%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

16.4 mi

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite health measure, Grant, Louisiana (ZIP 70644) ranks in the bottom 19% nationally (26,085th) and the top 40% of Louisiana (201st).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: household income lands in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and modeled humid heat sits in the top 5.6% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is in the top 6.7% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 7.5% nationally. More encouragingly, housing-cost burden resides at the national minimum, modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and poverty rests at the national minimum. Modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 70654, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%26.9–34.0
High blood pressure among adults39.9%35.6–44.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.2–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.0–11.5
Depression among adults31.1%26.7–35.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%10.9–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%34.2–43.2
Obesity among adults39.4%31.5–47.5
Stroke among adults4.0%3.4–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.5%12.5–18.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%6.2–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%73.9–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.3–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.1%81.0–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%59.1–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.2%54.3–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.4%70.9–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%15.3–22.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%16.0–23.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.4%25.2–36.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%29.6–43.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.9%20.1–28.5
Frequent mental distress among adults21.2%18.4–24.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.1–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.5%17.3–24.2
Any disability among adults39.5%33.9–45.5
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.0–12.8
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.2–20.1
Self-care disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.1–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.7%22.3–31.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.3%15.2–24.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.5%11.9–19.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%10.8–16.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–12.0
Loneliness among adults35.6%30.1–41.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.0–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)3.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription86.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate86.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+28.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age54.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$21,825$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$65,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 1.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.79 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured