Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70582

in Saint Martinville, LouisianaPopulation 19,209

38.36/ 100

Ranked #27,809 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.3%)

Ranked #274 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #19 of 30 Lafayette, LA ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

55.9%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.3%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

138.3 days/year

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

30 µg/L

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US68th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Saint Martinville, Louisiana (ZIP 70582), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 13.3% nationally (27,809th) and the bottom 46% of Louisiana (274th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 9.0% nationally, and radon sits in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, floodplain exposure registers in the top 3.1% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled obesity lands in the top 4.0% nationally, and humid heat is in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled short sleep resides in the top 11.2% nationally, and households without a vehicle rests in the top 11.6% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lies in the top 12.0% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 70518, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lafayette, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.8 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $49,837 predicts 77.3 years — 1.6 years below.

    Ranked #1,944 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%28.7–35.5
High blood pressure among adults44.7%40.6–48.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Depression among adults27.8%24.1–31.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.1%14.2–18.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%35.8–44.3
Obesity among adults45.3%37.8–52.7
Stroke among adults4.8%4.5–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.1%15.9–22.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.7–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.2–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.1%79.0–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%85.0–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%61.2–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.2%51.5–58.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%69.5–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.3–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.2%16.9–21.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.4%28.8–38.2
Short sleep duration among adults41.4%35.1–47.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.8%23.9–29.7
Frequent mental distress among adults20.1%17.9–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.7–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%17.2–21.2
Any disability among adults40.8%36.4–45.3
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Independent living disability among adults11.1%10.0–12.2
Mobility disability among adults19.9%17.7–22.1
Self-care disability among adults5.6%5.2–6.1
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.6–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.5%25.7–33.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.8%21.1–26.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.5%18.1–23.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.5–20.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Loneliness among adults37.1%32.2–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.7%11.2–14.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–647.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)18.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle11.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription80.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate77.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households51.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age42.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$49,837$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$163,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$765$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured