Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70577

in Port Barre, LouisianaPopulation 3,939

33.29/ 100

Ranked #29,958 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.6%)

Ranked #383 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

83.4%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.6%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

65.8%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

146.6 days/year

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.8%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.8%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.5%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

23.8%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.3%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By its overall health score, Port Barre, Louisiana (ZIP 70577) lands in the bottom 6.6% nationally (29,958th) and the bottom 25% of Louisiana (383rd).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: floodplain exposure is in the top 1.0% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability stands in the top 4.6% nationally. Home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and modeled humid heat lies in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled independent living disability resides in the top 7.5% nationally, modeled fair or poor health lands in the top 8.7% nationally, and slow internet speeds registers in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled tooth loss sits in the top 9.1% nationally, mobility disability rests in the top 10.3% nationally, and self-care disability is in the top 9.7% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 70512, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 82.9; chronic-disease standing 16.1 — 67 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,277 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.3%29.7–37.0
High blood pressure among adults44.8%40.3–49.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.4–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.1–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.6%10.3–12.8
Depression among adults28.7%24.7–33.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.5%14.5–18.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%36.5–45.7
Obesity among adults38.1%30.9–45.7
Stroke among adults5.0%4.6–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.8%19.7–28.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.2–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.2–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%77.6–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.5–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.4%56.9–67.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.2%47.2–55.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%68.0–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.5–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.9%19.9–25.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.6%29.6–39.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%31.4–44.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.8%26.5–33.1
Frequent mental distress among adults21.5%19.1–23.9
Frequent physical distress among adults18.6%16.5–20.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.6%19.3–23.9
Any disability among adults44.7%39.7–49.4
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Independent living disability among adults12.8%11.4–14.1
Mobility disability among adults21.8%19.3–24.4
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.7–6.8
Vision disability among adults7.9%7.2–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.8%25.1–32.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.0%22.0–28.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.1%20.4–26.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%15.1–19.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
Loneliness among adults36.9%32.2–41.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.7–14.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–649.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)11.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription65.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate75.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households51.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+14.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age37.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$47,072$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$101,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$863$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.6 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured