Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70420

in Abita Springs, LouisianaPopulation 7,950

52.65/ 100

Ranked #12,561 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #30 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (top 6.0%)

Ranked #5 of 15 Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

152 days/year

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.6%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.1%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.7%

in the bottom 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.62 per 1,000 residents

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

55.2%

in the top 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

6.5%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Abita Springs, Louisiana (ZIP 70420) sits in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,561st) and the top 6.0% of Louisiana (30th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading across the measures, this area's clearest strengths come through: modeled mammography registers in the top 2.9% nationally, and mental-health providers lands in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 12.9% nationally, and radon settles in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Modeled colon screening stands in the top 10.2% nationally, and tooth loss is in the bottom 11.5% nationally. Grocery rests in the top 15% nationally, and lithium in drinking water sits in the bottom 16% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat registers in the top 4.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. ZIP 70433, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.8 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $78,171 predicts 79.1 years — 1.3 years below.

    Ranked #1,668 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%26.6–32.6
High blood pressure among adults39.1%35.5–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Depression among adults25.8%22.6–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%35.3–42.9
Obesity among adults36.7%31.4–42.1
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.7%6.1–9.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.5–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.5–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.2–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults89.2%87.8–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.1%68.0–75.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.2%62.9–69.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.6%77.1–87.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.9%15.1–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%12.3–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.3%21.7–29.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%33.3–42.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.5%17.1–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.8–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.3–17.0
Any disability among adults33.7%29.7–37.6
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Independent living disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Mobility disability among adults15.0%13.1–17.0
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%20.0–26.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.1–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.1–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.0–12.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.1–8.0
Loneliness among adults30.9%26.8–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–6417.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)6.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)7.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription93.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate84.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households40.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$78,171$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$290,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$1,171$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured