Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68926

in Beaver City, NebraskaPopulation 684

49.79/ 100

Ranked #16,535 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #481 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.8 pCi/L

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

32.5 mi

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

4.6%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

71.2 mi

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

70.5%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.3%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.7%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Beaver City, Nebraska (ZIP 68926), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 48% nationally (16,535th) and the bottom 15% of Nebraska (481st).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled radon lies in the top 2.6% nationally, distance to a community health center sits in the top 3.5% nationally, and modeled nitrate settles in the top 4.3% nationally. Home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 6.5% nationally, modeled energy burden stands in the top 6.1% nationally, and modeled obesity lands in the top 7.0% nationally. On the brighter side, childcare is in the top 0.9% nationally, and civic resides in the top 2.2% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 6.4% nationally, and modeled short sleep lies in the bottom 6.8% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, childcare runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 68967, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.0–36.1
High blood pressure among adults40.0%35.9–44.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.4–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.4–10.5
Depression among adults17.3%14.4–20.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.7–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%33.2–41.5
Obesity among adults43.7%36.0–51.3
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.0%10.6–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.2–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%79.9–84.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.9–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.1–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%59.7–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.3%61.0–67.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.1%69.0–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.0–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%12.0–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.4%24.3–34.6
Short sleep duration among adults29.3%23.7–35.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.0%15.9–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults13.8%11.9–15.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.0–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.0–14.8
Any disability among adults33.4%28.7–38.1
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.4–11.9
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.3–9.9
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.3–19.9
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%16.4–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.0–15.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.2–11.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.0–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Loneliness among adults29.1%24.3–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.1–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)11.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription70.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate71.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population7.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households43.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+24.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$63,684$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$77,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$723$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured