Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68788

in West Point, NebraskaPopulation 4,588

54.02/ 100

Ranked #10,674 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #285 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.41 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.62 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.2%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.6%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

60.3%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

West Point, Nebraska (ZIP 68788), overall, ranks in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,674th) and the bottom 50% of Nebraska (285th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: elder services rests in the top 3.1% nationally, mental-health providers registers in the top 4.0% nationally, and outpatient resides in the top 5.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Grocery is in the top 7.0% nationally, and modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 7.9% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon lands in the top 6.4% nationally, and loud transportation noise lies in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled binge drinking stands in the top 8.3% nationally, and disaster risk rests in the top 10.5% nationally.

Defined simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 68791, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%23.8–30.3
High blood pressure among adults36.9%32.9–40.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Current asthma among adults8.9%7.9–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.4–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.0–8.5
Depression among adults16.5%13.9–19.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.4–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.3%32.1–40.7
Obesity among adults41.1%34.0–48.2
Stroke among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.3%10.8–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.9%9.8–14.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.3–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%72.6–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.5–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%54.9–65.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.9%57.1–64.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%67.9–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.2–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.9%11.5–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%24.4–33.9
Short sleep duration among adults29.6%24.0–35.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.3–21.1
Frequent mental distress among adults13.5%11.8–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.3–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.6–14.1
Any disability among adults30.8%26.6–35.3
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.5–8.8
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.2–17.1
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%17.7–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.6–15.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.0–10.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.2–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.8
Loneliness among adults30.5%25.8–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6417.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)12.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription79.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate68.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population10.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households56.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age42.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$69,867$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$211,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$778$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 1.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.03 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured