Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68743

in Jackson, NebraskaPopulation 814

50.19/ 100

Ranked #15,964 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #470 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #20 of 30 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.7 pCi/L

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.9%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.2%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.1%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.1%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.82%

in the top 11.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

18.8%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Jackson, Nebraska (ZIP 68743) lands in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,964th) and the bottom 17% of Nebraska (470th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: fiber broadband resides in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled pfas settles in the bottom 6.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon is in the top 0.6% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 6.3% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 7.0% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the top 6.1% nationally, and slow internet speeds stands in the top 10.1% nationally. Modeled fine-particle rests in the top 11.7% nationally, and transportation noise registers in the top 13.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Against the wider neighborhood, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. On the overall standing, ZIP 57038, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sioux City, IA-NE-SD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%26.0–31.8
High blood pressure among adults37.4%34.1–40.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
Depression among adults18.4%15.9–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.0–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.4–41.4
Obesity among adults44.1%39.1–49.1
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%9.2–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.4–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.6–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%75.0–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.3–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.9%58.3–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.3%55.9–62.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%67.5–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%15.1–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.4–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.7%26.8–35.1
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%27.7–36.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%16.6–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%12.9–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.2–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.4–14.9
Any disability among adults33.2%29.6–37.1
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.4
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.0–18.5
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.1–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.7–15.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.1–12.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.7–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.5–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6417.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)10.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription91.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate85.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households51.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+19.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age33.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$71,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$208,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$1,283$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured