Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68652

in Petersburg, NebraskaPopulation 630

52.48/ 100

Ranked #12,778 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #374 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.6%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

21.2 mi

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

17.3%

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US75th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

Petersburg, Nebraska (ZIP 68652), overall, ranks in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,778th) and the bottom 34% of Nebraska (374th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 2.1% nationally, recreation registers in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 10.7% nationally, and homeownership is in the top 17% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon sits in the top 2.2% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 7.6% nationally. Home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 12.8% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the top 14.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. ZIP 68620, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.4%28.9–36.1
High blood pressure among adults40.1%35.8–44.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.0–12.1
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Depression among adults17.1%14.4–20.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.3–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.4–44.0
Obesity among adults34.7%28.0–41.8
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.1–16.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%7.0–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.9%80.1–85.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.8–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.5–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.3%61.9–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.7%59.9–67.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%67.6–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.1–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%14.0–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.0%26.3–36.1
Short sleep duration among adults29.0%23.0–35.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.9%16.2–22.1
Frequent mental distress among adults13.3%11.7–15.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.5–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.8–14.3
Any disability among adults31.1%26.9–35.6
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.2–11.6
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Mobility disability among adults16.5%14.2–19.1
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.7–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%9.7–14.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.6–11.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.0–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.5–7.3
Loneliness among adults26.6%22.3–31.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–6417.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)6.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription77.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate90.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households64.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+38.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age53.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$79,271$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$120,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$800$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 1.3578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.35 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured