Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68522

in Lincoln, NebraskaPopulation 14,836

52.14/ 100

Ranked #13,266 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #393 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #42 of 46 Lincoln, NE ZIPs (bottom 8.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

22.1%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

28.7%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.2%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Park land

17.8%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

4.3%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.7%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.8%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.2%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 68522, one of several in Lincoln, Nebraska sits in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,266th) and the bottom 31% of Nebraska (393rd).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 2.4% nationally, park land resides in the top 7.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 1.8% nationally, and radon sits in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled transportation noise sits in the top 9.0% nationally, and crowded housing stands in the top 10.2% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 68339, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lincoln, NE metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 7.9 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 90.5 (top 10%) — 83 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,381 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.7%18.0–21.2
High blood pressure among adults29.0%26.8–31.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.5%5.0–6.0
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.4–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Depression among adults20.8%18.7–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.6–10.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened28.7%26.4–30.7
Obesity among adults37.9%34.7–41.1
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%12.3–17.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.0%10.2–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.2%68.5–73.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.5%69.9–74.9
Cholesterol screening among adults78.7%76.5–80.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.2%52.2–60.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.9%56.0–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%67.2–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.1%19.8–24.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.7–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%20.6–26.1
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%29.9–37.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.6–19.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.6–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.4–15.9
Any disability among adults27.3%24.6–30.2
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.6
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Mobility disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%21.0–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.4–19.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.9–15.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%11.2–15.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.8–10.2
Loneliness among adults32.6%29.1–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)14.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription97.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate72.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population11.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households43.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+7.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age32.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$77,597$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$235,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$1,204$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured