Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

68378

in Johnson, NebraskaPopulation 677

54.78/ 100

Ranked #9,726 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #243 of 566 Nebraska ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

38.3 mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.2%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.18%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97%

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Johnson, Nebraska (ZIP 68378) places in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,726th) and the top 43% of Nebraska (243rd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: civic rests in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 10.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription lands in the top 10.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity stands in the bottom 12.3% nationally, modeled cognitive disability registers in the bottom 11.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 13.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 15% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled radon lies in the top 2.3% nationally, and distance to a community health center rests in the top 2.4% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 68329, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.6%25.4–32.0
High blood pressure among adults36.2%32.2–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.6–11.6
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.4–8.8
Depression among adults17.5%14.8–20.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.5–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%31.5–39.4
Obesity among adults40.8%33.8–47.8
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%9.3–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.7–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.8–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%74.0–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.1–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%63.6–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.8%60.4–67.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%68.9–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.7%15.8–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.9%11.4–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.0%23.5–33.0
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%25.5–37.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.0–19.1
Frequent mental distress among adults13.2%11.5–15.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.1–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%9.6–12.9
Any disability among adults28.8%24.8–33.1
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.1–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.6%15.6–21.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.1–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.1–9.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.2–9.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.9–6.7
Loneliness among adults28.2%23.8–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.7–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (2.6–16.7%) n=578
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.4% (1.6–20.4%) n=579
No HS diploma (25+)2.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (1.5–11.9%) n=578
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.4% (12.1–39.7%) n=578
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.4% (0.0–5.8%) n=579
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.1% (0.0–7.6%) n=578
Broadband subscription97.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (75.9–96.3%) n=578
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.5% (7.6–30.4%) n=578
Homeownership rate89.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.5% (61.0–93.2%) n=578
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=578
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=579
Single-parent households45.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.2% (42.6–77.1%) n=577
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.2% (11.4–34.7%) n=579
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.0–56.3) n=577
Median household income$76,071$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,386 ($53,469–$103,625) n=556
Median home value$173,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$168,400 ($90,000–$306,740) n=533
Median gross rent$950$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$850 ($610–$1,250) n=442
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.1 yr (77.4–83.0) n=553

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured