Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67752

in Quinter, KansasPopulation 1,544

51.63/ 100

Ranked #13,939 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #227 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.8 pCi/L

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

35.3%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.72 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.72 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.72 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

30.8%

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.72 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Quinter, Kansas (ZIP 67752) lands in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,939th) and the top 33% of Kansas (227th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: fiber broadband resides at the national maximum, elder services settles in the top 1.4% nationally, and pharmacy is in the top 2.2% nationally. Childcare sits in the top 4.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 11.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon stands in the top 3.0% nationally, and nitrate rests in the top 1.3% nationally. Walkability registers in the bottom 7.5% nationally, and modeled extreme heat resides in the top 10.7% nationally.

Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. On the overall standing, ZIP 67631, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.4%28.1–34.9
High blood pressure among adults38.1%34.1–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%7.1–9.8
Depression among adults19.8%16.9–23.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.6–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.2–43.9
Obesity among adults36.7%29.5–44.4
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.2%9.9–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.6–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.1%79.6–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%73.8–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.1–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%62.3–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.9%62.4–69.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%64.4–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.1–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%12.5–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.5%24.0–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.8%24.8–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%15.9–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.7–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.9–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.3–16.1
Any disability among adults33.5%29.2–38.0
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.0–9.6
Mobility disability among adults16.1%13.8–18.8
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.3–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.4–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.8–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.2–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Loneliness among adults29.5%25.0–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.6–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6412.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)5.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription79.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate76.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+21.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$74,861$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$133,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$646$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.61 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured