Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67560

in Ness City, KansasPopulation 1,336

46.98/ 100

Ranked #20,181 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #486 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.64 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.64 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

33.1 mi

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.4%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.64 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

50 days/year

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ness City, Kansas (ZIP 67560), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 37% nationally (20,181st) and the bottom 29% of Kansas (486th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: distance to a community health center stands in the top 3.4% nationally, modeled radon is in the top 6.3% nationally, and modeled energy burden rests in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits in the top 9.4% nationally, and tree cover registers in the bottom 10.0% nationally. More positively, elder services lands in the top 1.7% nationally, and fiber broadband resides in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and pharmacy settles in the top 2.9% nationally. Civic stands in the top 8.7% nationally.

In everyday language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 67516, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.0%29.2–36.6
High blood pressure among adults40.2%35.7–44.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.4–10.7
Depression among adults20.0%16.8–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.6–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%36.6–45.6
Obesity among adults35.5%28.0–43.2
Stroke among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%14.5–21.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%7.6–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.7%80.1–85.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.4–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.8–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.8%57.1–67.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.8%56.9–64.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%63.4–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%11.6–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%12.5–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.4%24.9–35.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%28.5–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%17.1–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.2–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.3–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.3–16.6
Any disability among adults34.3%29.3–39.3
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.0–11.7
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.3–10.2
Mobility disability among adults17.5%14.6–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.5–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%16.9–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.7–14.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.5–8.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.0–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.6
Loneliness among adults28.6%24.0–33.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.1–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)0.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription90.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate80.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population11.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households56.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+19.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$68,654$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$121,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$638$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured