Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67451

in Hope, KansasPopulation 840

44.99/ 100

Ranked #22,407 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #574 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

27.7%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

19.7%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

43.1%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

18.5%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Hope, Kansas (ZIP 67451) comes out in the bottom 30% nationally (22,407th) and the bottom 16% of Kansas (574th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: fiber broadband registers in the top 5.3% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 16% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon lands in the top 6.1% nationally, poverty is in the top 8.4% nationally, and modeled extreme heat resides in the top 10.3% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the top 11.8% nationally, and coronary heart disease lies in the top 13.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity settles in the top 13.4% nationally, and fine-particle registers in the top 17% nationally.

In plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 67410, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.6%31.7–39.3
High blood pressure among adults43.1%38.6–47.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.2–12.5
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.5–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
Depression among adults20.8%17.6–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.7–16.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.9%37.4–46.4
Obesity among adults41.9%34.6–49.3
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.5%15.5–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%7.0–10.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.6%79.8–85.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.7–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.7–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%56.2–66.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.5%60.1–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.7%65.0–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.4–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%14.8–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.3%27.3–37.2
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%27.6–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.6%19.6–25.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.1–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.2–17.1
Any disability among adults37.8%33.1–42.3
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.2–10.7
Mobility disability among adults19.7%17.0–22.3
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%17.8–24.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.8–15.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.7–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.7–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.0–7.9
Loneliness among adults29.4%24.9–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription87.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate78.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households50.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age36.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$51,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$116,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$593$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured