Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67445

in Glasco, KansasPopulation 565

50.86/ 100

Ranked #15,055 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #270 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

4.1 pCi/L

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

32.3 mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.80%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.6%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.1%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$46,250

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Glasco, Kansas (ZIP 67445), on the composite measure, lands in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,055th) and the top 40% of Kansas (270th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: pharmacy lies in the top 0.3% nationally, childcare settles in the top 0.6% nationally, and civic stands in the top 1.7% nationally. Fiber broadband is in the top 7.4% nationally, and modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon sits in the top 1.5% nationally, and distance to a community health center registers in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled nitrate lands in the top 6.8% nationally, and walkability resides in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies in the top 10.6% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, pharmacy runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 67446, about 18 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.0–37.5
High blood pressure among adults42.3%37.8–46.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.2%10.8–13.4
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.8–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.1–9.8
Depression among adults20.2%17.1–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.1–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.4%35.7–45.2
Obesity among adults39.5%31.6–47.8
Stroke among adults4.3%3.7–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%9.6–14.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.6–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.0%80.5–85.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.4–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.0%86.4–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%61.1–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%61.7–68.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%64.9–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.6–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%11.1–16.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%22.6–32.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%26.1–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.1–20.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.8–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%11.8–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.4–15.2
Any disability among adults34.4%29.7–39.2
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.3–12.1
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.1–19.6
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.5%16.3–22.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.2–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.1–6.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.3
Loneliness among adults28.1%23.5–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6416.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)1.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle7.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription77.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate84.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households71.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+28.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age55.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$46,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$48,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$752$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.6 yr ± 1.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.77 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured