Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67218

in Wichita, KansasPopulation 23,383

37.76/ 100

Ranked #28,161 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.2%)

Ranked #669 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 2.0%)

Ranked #72 of 77 Wichita, KS ZIPs (bottom 6.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

16.4%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

404 units

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

130 intersections/sq mi

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

20.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

49.7%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

13.3%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 67218, one of several in Wichita, Kansas ranks in the bottom 12.2% nationally (28,161st) and the bottom 2.0% of Kansas (669th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 5.9% nationally, and walkability stands in the top 6.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 3.6% nationally, expected annual loss lands in the top 5.1% nationally, and utility shutoff sits in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the top 7.9% nationally, food insecurity settles in the top 8.7% nationally, and uninsured resides in the top 7.9% nationally. Homeownership registers in the bottom 8.9% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Close by, ZIP 67206, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Wichita, KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $49,059 predicts 77.3 years — 2.9 years below.

    Ranked #3,969 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.3 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.6 years — 4.2 years below them.

    Ranked #3,093 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.1%24.0–28.3
High blood pressure among adults37.7%35.1–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.8%6.2–7.4
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.9–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.9–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Depression among adults23.8%21.4–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%13.4–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%34.2–39.6
Obesity among adults43.2%39.5–47.0
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.6%17.8–23.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.8%14.9–18.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.9–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.9%70.1–75.6
Cholesterol screening among adults79.2%77.2–81.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.3%55.8–62.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.0%51.3–56.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%64.6–74.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%12.6–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.4%18.4–22.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.7%30.8–36.8
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%37.0–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.5%25.2–29.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.8–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%14.3–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%17.8–21.3
Any disability among adults37.5%34.6–40.4
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.8–13.0
Mobility disability among adults18.7%16.9–20.4
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.5–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.2%24.4–30.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.0%24.6–29.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.8%17.6–22.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.8%18.7–23.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.3%12.0–14.7
Loneliness among adults36.1%32.9–39.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.7–18.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6424.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)19.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle10.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription90.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate49.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population12.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households47.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age35.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$49,059$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$122,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$905$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured