Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

67127

in Protection, KansasPopulation 681

48.21/ 100

Ranked #18,665 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #422 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

38.1 mi

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

1.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.08%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

53.3 days/year

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

45.3%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Protection, Kansas (ZIP 67127), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 42% nationally (18,665th) and the bottom 38% of Kansas (422nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and loneliness registers in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Against that, distance to a community health center registers in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled nitrate is in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies in the top 8.4% nationally, and walkability registers in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Slow internet speeds is in the top 12.2% nationally, and modeled tree cover lies in the bottom 13.9% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 67029, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 1.0%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%30.3–37.9
High blood pressure among adults41.7%37.2–46.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.4%10.3–12.5
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Depression among adults20.7%17.5–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.0–16.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.5%36.9–46.2
Obesity among adults39.6%31.0–48.3
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.4%10.8–16.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%7.0–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.1%80.6–85.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%76.6–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.7–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%60.4–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.4%63.8–70.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%65.7–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.4–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%12.8–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.7%24.6–35.2
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%26.2–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%17.2–23.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.5–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.7–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.3–16.2
Any disability among adults35.3%30.6–40.4
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.8
Mobility disability among adults17.6%14.9–20.4
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.4–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%17.1–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.2–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.3–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.9–11.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Loneliness among adults28.6%24.2–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6419.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription83.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households71.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+23.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age48.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$68,438$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$55,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$529$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured