Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66839

in Burlington, KansasPopulation 3,654

46.32/ 100

Ranked #20,967 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #523 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.25 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

18.1 mi

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

30.8%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.75 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

59%

in the bottom 11.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

7.4%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

42.8%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Burlington, Kansas (ZIP 66839) places in the bottom 35% nationally (20,967th) and the bottom 23% of Kansas (523rd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: pharmacy registers in the top 5.2% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Elder services lies in the top 5.7% nationally, and dental providers rests in the top 12.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled disaster risk is in the top 9.3% nationally, distance to a community health center lands in the top 9.4% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the top 9.7% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 11.4% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 66852, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%28.4–35.4
High blood pressure among adults38.8%34.6–43.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Depression among adults21.7%18.5–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.2–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%33.9–42.8
Obesity among adults38.1%30.6–46.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%9.7–14.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.1–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.2–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%74.9–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.1–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.0%53.5–64.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.8%54.0–61.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.2%62.4–78.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.8–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%14.7–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.6%23.8–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%28.0–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.2%17.3–23.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.8–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.7–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.7–18.0
Any disability among adults34.9%30.3–39.9
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.9–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.8%14.5–19.4
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.6–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.3–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.7–15.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.9–10.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.0–12.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.4
Loneliness among adults29.3%24.6–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)6.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle8.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate66.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households48.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age42.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$63,077$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$175,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$876$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 1.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.11 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured