Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66424

in Everest, KansasPopulation 486

46.00/ 100

Ranked #21,357 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #541 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

15.7%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

14.2%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.1%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

25.1%

in the top 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Everest, Kansas (ZIP 66424) comes out in the bottom 33% nationally (21,357th) and the bottom 21% of Kansas (541st).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: fiber broadband stands in the top 6.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 12.9% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. By contrast, unemployment resides in the top 3.4% nationally, and modeled transportation noise rests in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 6.7% nationally, and poverty sits in the top 10.8% nationally. Walkability settles in the bottom 13.1% nationally, and modeled radon registers in the top 17% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 66017, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.5–36.0
High blood pressure among adults40.7%36.7–44.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.7–11.4
Depression among adults22.1%19.0–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.1–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%35.2–43.1
Obesity among adults40.4%33.2–47.8
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.9%13.2–18.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%7.2–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.4–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.7–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.0%82.0–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.6%57.9–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.7%58.4–64.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%63.2–77.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.5–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%16.2–21.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.5%26.0–35.4
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%27.6–38.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%19.0–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.7–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.6–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.5%14.6–18.5
Any disability among adults35.9%31.6–40.3
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.7–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%17.9–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.1–17.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.0–11.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.5–13.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.9–9.1
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.9–34.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6424.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)15.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription90.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate80.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+21.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$58,553$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$131,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$707$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured