Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66088

in Valley Falls, KansasPopulation 2,697

53.37/ 100

Ranked #11,545 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #150 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #25 of 57 Topeka, KS ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.87 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.43 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

11.9%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

34.1%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Valley Falls, Kansas (ZIP 66088), in overall standing, comes out in the top 36% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,545th) and the top 22% of Kansas (150th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: pharmacy rests in the top 1.5% nationally, and elder services settles in the top 2.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Poverty rests in the bottom 13.9% nationally, and civic settles in the top 15% nationally. Modeled transportation noise lands in the bottom 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, households without a vehicle settles in the top 11.1% nationally, and modeled extreme heat lands in the top 15% nationally. Recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 66066, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Topeka, KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%25.9–32.6
High blood pressure among adults35.8%32.1–40.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.6–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Depression among adults21.3%18.2–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.0–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%33.3–41.7
Obesity among adults35.4%28.9–42.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.2–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.4–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.7–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.1–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.0–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.7%60.8–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.7%61.3–68.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.3%66.9–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%13.9–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%13.0–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%22.2–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.8%28.0–39.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.7–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.3–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.7–16.3
Any disability among adults32.6%28.7–37.1
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.4
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.8
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.7
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%17.6–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.7–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.8–7.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.9–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.0
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.3–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6411.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)5.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle11.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription87.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate74.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households56.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age45.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$75,795$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$196,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$785$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured