ZIP code
62999
in Zeigler, IllinoisPopulation 1,267
42.05/ 100
Ranked #25,179 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)
Ranked #1,262 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 7.8%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Floodplain exposure
48.3%
in the top 4.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
10.4%
in the top 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
9.8%
in the top 8.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST83rdUS91stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 9.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS10thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Median household income
$41,553
in the bottom 6.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST4thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
39.2%
in the top 22% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS78thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
5.7 mi
in the top 25% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS75thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
86.4 days/year
in the top 30% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS70thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›The read
Zeigler, Illinois (ZIP 62999), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 21% nationally (25,179th) and the bottom 7.8% of Illinois (1,262nd).
An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Against that, floodplain exposure is in the top 4.3% nationally, and unemployment lies in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled transportation noise registers in the top 8.9% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 12.5% nationally, and household income registers in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled mammography is in the bottom 12.4% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.
Defined simply, for reference, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 62865, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 43%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 43%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 35%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 13%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 27%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 20%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 30%
8%
Disability
healthier than 34%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 7%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 57%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 52%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 22%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 9%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 19%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 7%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 6%
8%
Disability
healthier than 13%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 3%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
62865
Illinoisshares a border
Score 45.37
Closest healthier
62918
Illinoisshares a border
Score 53.95
Similar health profile
62957
Illinois98% similar profile
Score 39.97
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.9% | 27.2–34.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 37.6% | 33.1–42.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.4% | 8.4–10.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.0% | 9.6–12.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.1% | 7.1–9.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.8% | 8.3–11.6 |
| Depression among adults | 23.8% | 20.0–27.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.3% | 11.5–15.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 37.7% | 33.1–42.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 40.8% | 32.1–49.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.2% | 3.7–4.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.8% | 11.9–18.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.6% | 6.5–11.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.8% | 74.7–80.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.3% | 74.3–81.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.3% | 82.9–87.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.3% | 56.4–68.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 56.1% | 51.9–60.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 69.6% | 60.2–78.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.5% | 14.3–21.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.4% | 14.4–21.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 27.0% | 21.9–32.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.2% | 32.1–47.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 22.4% | 19.0–26.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.6% | 16.2–21.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.7% | 13.6–18.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.7% | 13.2–18.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 34.7% | 29.6–40.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.7% | 7.6–9.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 10.1% | 8.6–11.7 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 17.0% | 14.4–20.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.9–5.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.7% | 4.9–6.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.9% | 20.7–29.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.1% | 12.8–19.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 16.7% | 13.2–20.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.1% | 9.9–14.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.6% | 7.2–10.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.7% | 28.1–39.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.2% | 6.8–9.7 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 16.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 7.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 10.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 13.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 10.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375 |
| Households without a vehicle | 6.7% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377 |
| Broadband subscription | 81.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 24.3% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377 |
| Homeownership rate | 76.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.4% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378 |
| Single-parent households | 52.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372 |
| Population 65+ | 20.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378 |
| Median age | 48.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373 |
| Median household income | $41,553 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334 |
| Median home value | $57,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332 |
| Median gross rent | $920 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.5 yr ± 1.14 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.14 years of 74.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured