Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62897

in Whittington, IllinoisPopulation 542

42.83/ 100

Ranked #24,523 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #1,239 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 9.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

2.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.02% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

2.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.9%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

16.9%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.4%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

31.5%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

25.8%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

18.7%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

86.4 days/year

in the top 30% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US70th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Whittington, Illinois (ZIP 62897) stands in the bottom 24% nationally (24,523rd) and the bottom 9.5% of Illinois (1,239th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled loud transportation noise settles in the top 2.3% nationally, and transportation noise rests in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled mammography lands in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 9.3% nationally. Poverty rests in the top 10.0% nationally, modeled pfas lands in the top 11.0% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 12.4% nationally. On the brighter side, grocery rests in the top 0.02% nationally, recreation lands in the top 1.1% nationally, and lead in tap water settles at the national minimum.

Set beside the wider area around it, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 62816, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.2%27.3–34.9
High blood pressure among adults37.8%33.5–42.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.2–11.9
Depression among adults23.7%19.7–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.5–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%33.8–43.0
Obesity among adults40.2%31.4–48.8
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.7%15.0–22.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%5.8–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%75.6–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%74.6–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%82.5–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.6%57.1–68.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.7%57.7–65.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.4%58.0–76.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%14.4–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%13.3–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%21.0–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%29.7–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%18.1–26.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%15.8–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.2–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%12.8–18.0
Any disability among adults34.3%28.9–39.6
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.5–9.9
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.2–11.6
Mobility disability among adults16.8%14.0–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.8–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.6–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.0–28.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%11.6–18.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.4%11.9–19.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.8–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.7
Loneliness among adults33.3%27.6–39.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.2–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6440.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)29.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)8.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle7.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription84.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate79.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households30.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+8.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age26.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$78,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$89,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$967$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 1.4078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.40 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured