Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62664

in Mason City, IllinoisPopulation 2,922

48.88/ 100

Ranked #17,824 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #849 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.37 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.5%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.37 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.17%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

45.8 mi

in the top 14.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

84.1%

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mason City, Illinois (ZIP 62664), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 44% nationally (17,824th) and the bottom 38% of Illinois (849th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: grocery stands in the top 2.7% nationally, dental providers resides in the top 5.4% nationally, and modeled pfas sits in the bottom 8.0% nationally. Pharmacy stands in the top 9.6% nationally, and modeled transportation noise resides in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 14.6% nationally. Against that, modeled radon resides in the top 7.5% nationally, and arsenic sits in the top 11.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands in the top 14.5% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 62642, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%27.7–35.4
High blood pressure among adults38.3%33.7–43.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%7.8–10.8
Depression among adults22.8%19.2–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%10.9–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%34.4–44.1
Obesity among adults36.7%28.0–45.9
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.4%11.6–17.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%5.9–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%75.9–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.4–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.0–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%58.5–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.7%55.5–63.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.1%60.8–78.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.1–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%12.6–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%20.3–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%28.7–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.3%17.1–23.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.0–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%12.8–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.1–16.3
Any disability among adults32.7%28.0–37.8
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.5–9.8
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.1%13.6–18.8
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.5–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.4–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.4%19.3–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%10.5–16.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.5–16.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.3–12.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.0–8.4
Loneliness among adults32.2%26.8–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–648.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle7.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription85.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate81.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households52.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+23.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age44.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$70,509$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$101,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$800$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured