ZIP code
62319
in Camden, IllinoisPopulation 218
36.47/ 100
Ranked #28,772 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)
Ranked #1,337 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 2.3%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Coronary heart disease
12.6%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.4%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
12.8%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
24.8%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Households without a vehicle
26.8%
in the top 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with no vehicle available.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
49.3%
in the top 4.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
19%
in the top 5.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
0.01%
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS6thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
6.7%
in the top 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
8.7%
in the bottom 6.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Camden, Illinois (ZIP 62319) places in the bottom 10.3% nationally (28,772nd) and the bottom 2.3% of Illinois (1,337th).
The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled coronary heart disease sits in the top 1.1% nationally, and stroke lies in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the top 2.3% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the top 3.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle is in the top 2.9% nationally, modeled high blood pressure lands in the top 4.1% nationally, and modeled diabetes stands in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled self-care disability registers in the top 7.4% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and pfas sits in the bottom 6.2% nationally.
For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 61452, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 80%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 48%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 50%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 16%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Disability
healthier than 7%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 28%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 10%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 96%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 53%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.10%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 19%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 34%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.9%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 13%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 12%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
61452
Illinoisshares a border
Score 38.03
Closest healthier
62344
Illinoisshares a border
Score 37.99
Similar health profile
74935
Oklahoma99% similar profile
Score 39.34
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 41.0% | 36.6–45.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 49.3% | 44.2–54.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 12.8% | 11.5–14.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.1% | 9.7–12.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 12.6% | 11.0–14.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 14.8% | 12.4–17.4 |
| Depression among adults | 23.0% | 19.4–27.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 19.0% | 16.2–22.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.1% | 39.8–50.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 42.5% | 33.0–52.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.4% | 5.5–7.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.7% | 16.7–25.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.9% | 6.7–11.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 83.9% | 81.0–86.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.7% | 79.3–85.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.4% | 87.7–91.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.1% | 56.4–67.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 54.5% | 50.3–58.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 68.1% | 58.2–76.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.0% | 10.4–15.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 20.3% | 16.6–24.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 33.5% | 27.4–40.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.8% | 28.7–43.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 28.8% | 24.5–34.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.9% | 14.7–19.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.3% | 16.6–22.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 15.6% | 13.3–18.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 41.1% | 35.4–47.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.8% | 11.2–14.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.5% | 10.6–14.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 24.8% | 21.0–29.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.7% | 5.7–7.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.1% | 6.9–9.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 22.7% | 19.2–26.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.9% | 15.3–23.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 22.5% | 18.3–27.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.3% | 10.1–14.8 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.1% | 7.6–10.7 |
| Loneliness among adults | 30.7% | 25.7–36.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.2% | 7.7–10.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 9.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 4.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 16.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375 |
| Households without a vehicle | 26.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377 |
| Broadband subscription | 71.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 25.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377 |
| Homeownership rate | 93.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378 |
| Single-parent households | 84.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372 |
| Population 65+ | 34.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378 |
| Median age | 60.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373 |
| Median household income | $49,500 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334 |
| Median home value | $107,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.0 yr ± 1.10 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured