Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62078

in Wilmington, IllinoisPopulation 73

50.43/ 100

Ranked #15,644 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #727 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

7.4%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.9%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

28.8%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

19 mi

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

48.6 mi

in the top 13.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 62078, one of several in Wilmington, Illinois lands in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,644th) and the bottom 47% of Illinois (727th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: modeled transportation noise lies at the national minimum, and expected annual loss lands in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, and modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled mammography stands in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and poverty lies in the top 7.6% nationally.

A note on the terms: expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 62045, about 13 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%26.4–34.7
High blood pressure among adults38.6%33.9–43.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.6–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.8–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.4–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%6.4–11.2
Depression among adults21.7%18.1–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%10.4–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%35.7–45.5
Obesity among adults38.5%29.9–48.0
Stroke among adults3.8%3.0–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.1–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%4.4–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%74.9–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%74.6–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%85.6–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%58.0–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%58.8–66.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.9%62.3–73.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%14.8–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%11.4–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%17.4–28.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%28.6–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%14.8–24.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%13.7–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%11.7–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%10.5–15.9
Any disability among adults30.1%24.1–36.2
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.6–9.3
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.3–9.7
Mobility disability among adults14.5%11.1–18.3
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.0–5.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.6–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%20.4–27.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%8.5–14.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.6%7.5–13.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.0–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.0–7.6
Loneliness among adults31.5%28.1–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.6–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–642.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)19.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription88.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households27.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+12.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$32,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured