Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62075

in Wenonah, IllinoisPopulation 3,330

48.34/ 100

Ranked #18,499 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #913 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.62 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.93 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.62 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Wenonah, Illinois (ZIP 62075) sits in the bottom 42% nationally (18,499th) and the bottom 33% of Illinois (913th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation stands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center resides in the top 19% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 20% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands in the top 20% nationally. Childcare resides at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. On the better side, grocery sits in the top 1.0% nationally, and pharmacy stands in the top 1.3% nationally. Outpatient resides in the top 5.1% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 62011, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.6–34.8
High blood pressure among adults38.1%33.9–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.2–11.3
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.2–10.9
Depression among adults22.8%19.4–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.1–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%34.3–43.4
Obesity among adults38.2%30.2–46.9
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%10.5–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.7–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.1–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.0–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%84.8–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%58.3–68.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.7%55.8–63.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%63.2–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%14.5–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%13.8–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.1%21.6–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%28.5–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%18.3–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.5–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.4–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.8–16.8
Any disability among adults33.8%29.3–38.8
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.5%14.2–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.6–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.8%21.1–28.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.4–16.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.2–16.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.9–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.4
Loneliness among adults33.5%28.4–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–641.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)10.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle8.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription81.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate79.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households49.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+22.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age36.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$65,954$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$93,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$909$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 1.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.07 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured