Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

61548

in Metamora, IllinoisPopulation 12,037

61.47/ 100

Ranked #3,826 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.0%)

Ranked #142 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 10.4%)

Ranked #6 of 67 Peoria, IL ZIPs (top 9.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

33.3%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

9.5 ppb

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$128,559

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.9%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.6%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

9.6%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.5%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Metamora, Illinois (ZIP 61548) comes out in the top 12.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,826th) and the top 10.4% of Illinois (142nd).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled transportation registers in the bottom 5.9% nationally, household income stands in the top 7.4% nationally, and lithium in drinking water lands in the bottom 6.9% nationally. Modeled food insecurity is in the bottom 7.0% nationally, utility shutoff resides in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and housing insecurity rests in the bottom 8.8% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 9.0% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability sits in the bottom 7.3% nationally. By contrast, modeled arsenic settles in the top 2.5% nationally, and lead in tap water registers in the top 3.8% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 61615, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Peoria, IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%23.8–30.8
High blood pressure among adults33.9%29.6–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Depression among adults21.1%17.7–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.5–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%32.6–42.0
Obesity among adults35.8%27.5–44.6
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.0–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.2–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.2–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.0–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.3–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%61.0–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.7%69.3–75.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%66.6–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%15.5–22.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.4%8.7–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.2%14.7–22.3
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%24.5–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.2%12.1–16.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.4%12.6–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults11.3%9.9–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.5%9.2–12.0
Any disability among adults25.1%21.3–29.4
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.4–7.1
Mobility disability among adults11.0%9.4–12.9
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%17.4–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.4–9.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.6–8.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.0–8.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.5
Loneliness among adults30.4%25.4–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–643.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate93.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households53.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age39.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$128,559$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$238,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,154$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured