Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

61441

in Ipava, IllinoisPopulation 945

45.27/ 100

Ranked #22,118 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #1,125 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.4%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

19 mi

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.9 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 14.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.7%

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

17.6 days/year

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US75th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

8.8%

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US76th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

41.4%

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US74th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ipava, Illinois (ZIP 61441), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 31% nationally (22,118th) and the bottom 18% of Illinois (1,125th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: civic lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 13.5% nationally. Physicians registers in the top 15% nationally. Pulling the other way, slow internet speeds settles in the top 8.0% nationally, distance to a community health center sits in the top 8.8% nationally, and modeled radon lies in the top 11.6% nationally. Unemployment rests in the top 12.2% nationally, walkability resides in the bottom 14.2% nationally, and modeled mammography is in the bottom 13.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden lands in the top 13.1% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 61482, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.5%29.5–37.6
High blood pressure among adults41.4%36.7–46.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.6–11.4
Depression among adults23.6%19.7–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%11.9–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%35.7–45.7
Obesity among adults39.8%31.2–49.2
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%11.7–17.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%6.1–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%76.8–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%76.2–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.9–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%57.8–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.2%57.1–65.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.9%60.6–78.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.3–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%13.7–19.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%21.6–31.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%28.7–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.5%18.4–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.2–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.5–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.2–16.2
Any disability among adults34.3%29.5–39.2
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.5
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Mobility disability among adults17.3%14.8–19.9
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.3–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%11.7–16.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.6%11.9–17.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.9–12.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.5
Loneliness among adults31.9%26.6–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.1–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle8.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription86.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate78.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households50.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+13.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age33.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$65,972$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$128,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,115$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.7 yr ± 1.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.68 years of 79.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured