Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

61435

in Gerlaw, IllinoisPopulation 271

50.59/ 100

Ranked #15,444 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #714 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

5.1%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

43.7%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.23%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 13.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US14th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Gerlaw, Illinois (ZIP 61435) stands in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,444th) and the bottom 48% of Illinois (714th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled pfas stands in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Unemployment sits at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 11.0% nationally, and expected annual loss sits in the bottom 13.7% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. By contrast, homeownership stands in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography resides in the bottom 14.1% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 61412, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%25.7–33.3
High blood pressure among adults37.2%32.6–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.5–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%6.9–9.9
Depression among adults22.6%18.9–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.2–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.0–42.5
Obesity among adults37.5%28.7–46.9
Stroke among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.1–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%5.7–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.0–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.0–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%84.4–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%59.1–69.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.5%58.3–66.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%60.6–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%14.8–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%12.5–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.1%19.4–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%28.5–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%16.5–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.0–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.3–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%11.8–16.6
Any disability among adults31.9%27.1–37.4
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.1–9.5
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.2–10.0
Mobility disability among adults14.9%12.4–17.7
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.2–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.1–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.1%20.8–29.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.0–16.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.4%9.4–15.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.5–12.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.8–8.4
Loneliness among adults33.6%28.0–39.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription88.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate43.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households37.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+3.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age25.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$708$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.9 yr ± 2.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.67 years of 83.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured