Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

61320

in Dalzell, IllinoisPopulation 727

48.65/ 100

Ranked #18,137 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #878 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

14.3 mi

in the top 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Dalzell, Illinois (ZIP 61320), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 43% nationally (18,137th) and the bottom 36% of Illinois (878th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 5.7% nationally, floodplain exposure stands in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 14.5% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Against that, fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to an emergency room resides in the top 12.5% nationally, and distance to a community health center sits in the top 14.6% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 16% nationally. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians sits at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 61354, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.2–34.9
High blood pressure among adults38.0%33.3–42.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%6.8–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%7.6–11.0
Depression among adults23.4%19.6–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.0–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%34.5–44.0
Obesity among adults38.5%30.2–47.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.1–14.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.0–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.5%75.1–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%75.0–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%84.8–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%58.7–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.4%57.2–65.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%64.5–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.1–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%13.2–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%20.5–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%28.9–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%17.2–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.0–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%12.9–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.1–16.5
Any disability among adults32.8%27.7–37.9
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.2–9.5
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.7–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.2%13.4–19.1
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.4–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.5%20.4–28.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%10.7–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.6%10.5–16.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.6–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.1–8.6
Loneliness among adults33.3%27.9–39.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.8–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–642.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription83.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate81.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households47.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+17.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age40.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$76,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$161,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$919$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured