Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60142

in Huntley, IllinoisPopulation 29,692

59.71/ 100

Ranked #5,073 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #195 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 14.3%)

Ranked #157 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.0%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.5%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.5%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.4%

in the bottom 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

9.0%

in the bottom 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

152 units

in the top 14.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

30.1%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Huntley, Illinois (ZIP 60142) ranks in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,073rd) and the top 14.3% of Illinois (195th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: lithium in drinking water rests in the bottom 7.2% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff stands in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled transportation lies in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and short sleep lands in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the bottom 7.3% nationally, housing insecurity is in the bottom 10.4% nationally, and food insecurity settles in the bottom 12.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 6.0% nationally, and arsenic rests in the top 10.4% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Close by, ZIP 60014, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.9 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $89,735 predicts 79.7 years — 1.2 years above.

    Ranked #1,386 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.9–35.8
High blood pressure among adults39.3%35.9–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.3%11.4–13.3
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.5–8.5
Depression among adults19.6%17.0–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.2–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%36.3–43.6
Obesity among adults30.8%26.0–36.0
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.6%8.0–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.6–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%79.0–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.7–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%89.8–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.7%61.7–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.4%65.3–71.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%69.9–81.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.8–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%8.7–11.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.6%19.4–26.0
Short sleep duration among adults29.5%25.1–34.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%15.0–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults13.4%11.9–14.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.3–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Any disability among adults29.5%26.3–33.0
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.6–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.4–9.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.3–8.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.3–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–646.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription90.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate89.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population10.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households56.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+33.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age49.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$89,735$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$339,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,613$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured