Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60115

in DeKalb, IllinoisPopulation 42,536

48.50/ 100

Ranked #18,304 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #892 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #300 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

11 ppb

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

US98th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

834 units

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

45.7%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.9%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

43%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

13.7%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

9.9%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, DeKalb, Illinois (ZIP 60115) sits in the bottom 43% nationally (18,304th) and the bottom 35% of Illinois (892nd).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: lead in tap water settles in the top 1.8% nationally, modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 1.9% nationally, and housing-cost burden is in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled disaster risk rests in the top 5.6% nationally, homeownership sits in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and modeled transportation registers in the top 8.6% nationally. Unemployment lands in the top 9.8% nationally. Better still, subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol lies in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Mental-health providers settles in the top 8.9% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 60111, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.7%18.1–23.6
High blood pressure among adults30.0%26.2–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.8–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Depression among adults24.1%20.4–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.7–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.9%27.0–35.1
Obesity among adults37.4%29.8–46.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.0–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.9%10.2–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.7%64.7–70.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.8%70.6–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults79.1%76.6–81.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.0%56.2–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.8%52.6–60.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%63.4–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%15.4–22.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.2–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%21.8–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%29.7–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%19.0–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.8%18.4–23.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.5–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%15.9–20.3
Any disability among adults33.2%28.9–38.1
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.6–12.2
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.8–14.1
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.1%23.3–31.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.2%21.4–27.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.0%21.4–26.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.9–20.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.7%12.2–15.2
Loneliness among adults36.9%31.7–42.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.0–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)11.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)9.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle9.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription90.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate43.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population9.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households40.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+11.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age26.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$47,043$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$208,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,018$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured