Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59910

in Big Arm, MontanaPopulation 692

46.09/ 100

Ranked #21,245 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #245 of 341 Montana ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

5.1%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

68.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

16.5%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.2%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

17.5 mi

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.3%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.6%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.7%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.1%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Big Arm, Montana (ZIP 59910) ranks in the bottom 34% nationally (21,245th) and the bottom 28% of Montana (245th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled fine-particle settles in the top 1.1% nationally, and floodplain exposure resides in the top 1.8% nationally. Unemployment registers in the top 3.1% nationally, and modeled hearing disability rests in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled arsenic stands in the top 9.4% nationally. On the better side, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 0.6% nationally, modeled pfas lands in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 6.3% nationally. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 7.9% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Close by, ZIP 59860, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.8%33.3–40.3
High blood pressure among adults39.8%35.9–43.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.9%10.9–13.1
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.5–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.0–10.9
Depression among adults23.6%20.5–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.6–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%32.8–40.4
Obesity among adults32.8%27.5–38.4
Stroke among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.2%8.3–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%6.9–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%75.9–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%74.6–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.8–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%63.8–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.5%61.0–67.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.9%63.7–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%14.0–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.3–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%19.8–27.7
Short sleep duration among adults29.6%24.7–34.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.5%18.5–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%14.0–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.6–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%11.9–15.5
Any disability among adults34.1%30.0–38.4
Hearing disability among adults11.3%10.1–12.7
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.5–20.7
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.5–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.7–16.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.4–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.9–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.6
Loneliness among adults28.8%24.4–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.0–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6438.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)5.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)16.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription80.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate77.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households67.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+26.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$99,886$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$588,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured