Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59760

in Willow Creek, MontanaPopulation 221

54.19/ 100

Ranked #10,448 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #57 of 341 Montana ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #9 of 10 Bozeman, MT ZIPs (bottom 10.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a nursing home

23.4 mi

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

23.5 mi

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.2%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST55th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.3%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

18 mi

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.03%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Willow Creek, Montana (ZIP 59760), overall, ranks in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,448th) and the top 17% of Montana (57th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally, obesity resides in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 5.9% nationally, and floodplain exposure sits in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Set against that, distance to a nursing home lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and distance to an emergency room lies in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled fine-particle stands in the top 4.0% nationally, and walkability rests in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Modeled binge drinking registers in the top 6.2% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 59741, about 1.4 miles away, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bozeman, MT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%27.0–33.0
High blood pressure among adults31.3%28.0–34.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.3–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%5.8–8.4
Depression among adults23.0%20.1–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.6%8.1–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.1%29.8–36.4
Obesity among adults26.3%22.1–30.4
Stroke among adults3.4%2.9–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.6%9.5–14.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%6.6–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.1%69.6–76.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.9%68.4–75.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%81.9–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.1%63.0–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.3%61.2–67.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%65.3–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.0%17.3–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%10.8–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.9%14.6–21.5
Short sleep duration among adults30.5%26.8–34.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.7%14.0–19.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.7–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.0–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%11.6–15.7
Any disability among adults28.6%24.6–32.5
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Mobility disability among adults11.8%9.8–14.0
Self-care disability among adults3.4%2.9–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.5–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.1%17.2–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%7.9–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.6–9.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.6–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Loneliness among adults30.0%26.4–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.9–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6415.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)10.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription95.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate94.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households76.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+23.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age55.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$63,571$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$464,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 1.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.97 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured