Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59749

in Sheridan, MontanaPopulation 2,029

55.37/ 100

Ranked #9,016 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #40 of 341 Montana ZIPs (top 11.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

27.3 mi

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.3%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

5.2 days/year

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Park land

33.6%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Sheridan, Montana (ZIP 59749) stands in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,016th) and the top 11.8% of Montana (40th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: grocery lies in the top 1.0% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and short sleep lies in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 3.3% nationally, pharmacy registers in the top 3.3% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Park land is in the top 4.2% nationally, dental providers registers in the top 4.2% nationally, and fiber broadband lies in the top 5.3% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 59710, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.3%32.3–40.4
High blood pressure among adults38.9%34.5–43.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.8%11.6–14.1
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.7–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.2–10.1
Depression among adults21.7%18.3–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.0–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%33.8–42.9
Obesity among adults29.1%22.6–36.3
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.5%6.0–9.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%6.8–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%76.5–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.3–79.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.8–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.9%65.8–75.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.6%64.0–70.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%66.4–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%13.9–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.2%10.7–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.5%17.4–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults27.3%21.9–33.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.4–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.0–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.1–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.0–14.8
Any disability among adults32.9%28.2–37.4
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.6–12.3
Independent living disability among adults8.1%6.9–9.4
Mobility disability among adults15.9%13.5–18.5
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.4–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.3–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.8–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.4–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.1–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Loneliness among adults28.1%23.5–32.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.3–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6413.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription86.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate86.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households76.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+34.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age58.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$80,238$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$382,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$942$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 1.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.72 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured