Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58540

in Garrison, North DakotaPopulation 2,634

52.98/ 100

Ranked #12,113 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #251 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

234.6 mi

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.7%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.35 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

25.2%

in the top 12.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US78th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US74th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 37% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US63rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Garrison, North Dakota (ZIP 58540) comes out in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,113th) and the bottom 32% of North Dakota (251st).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: distance to a Superfund site is in the top 0.7% nationally, fiber broadband resides in the top 3.7% nationally, and elder services rests in the top 3.8% nationally. Recreation lies in the top 4.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Pharmacy settles in the top 10.7% nationally, and modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 11.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled fine-particle stands in the top 3.0% nationally, and radon lands in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled hearing disability is in the top 10.9% nationally.

In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 58523, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.8%30.2–37.4
High blood pressure among adults40.4%36.1–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.2–12.5
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.5–8.7
Depression among adults19.3%16.4–22.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.1–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%35.8–44.4
Obesity among adults40.7%33.9–47.5
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.3%10.7–16.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.6–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.0%80.2–85.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.9–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.1–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%62.5–72.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.9%61.2–68.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%70.2–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.5–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%11.9–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%22.3–31.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%26.0–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.1–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults12.9%11.2–14.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.7–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
Any disability among adults31.7%27.5–35.9
Hearing disability among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.1–17.7
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%18.7–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.6–12.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.0–7.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.0–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.1
Loneliness among adults28.9%24.7–33.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–646.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription84.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate86.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households62.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+37.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age54.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$76,319$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$228,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$643$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured