ZIP code
58416
in Binford, North DakotaPopulation 384
55.90/ 100
Ranked #8,382 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)
Ranked #131 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 35%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Loneliness
26.1%
in the bottom 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
140.3 mi
in the top 2.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST32ndUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 3.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Distance to a community health center
32 mi
in the top 3.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST74thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.
Full methodology ›Radon
3.2 pCi/L
in the top 7.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST45thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.
Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
2.1%
in the top 5.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST70thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
6.8%
in the bottom 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST13thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
97.9%
in the top 6.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST53rdUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
1.4%
in the top 6.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST37thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
4.6%
in the bottom 8.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST22ndUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
Binford, North Dakota (ZIP 58416), in overall standing, comes out in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,382nd) and the top 35% of North Dakota (131st), based on limited data; treat as directional.
A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally, distance to a Superfund site registers in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 6.0% nationally, fiber broadband registers in the top 6.8% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 8.6% nationally. On the other hand, distance to a community health center lies in the top 3.7% nationally, and modeled radon registers in the top 7.7% nationally. Slow internet speeds is in the top 5.6% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lies in the top 6.9% nationally.
Defined simply, for reference, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 58484, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 67%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 81%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 75%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 95%
8%
Disability
healthier than 62%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 87%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 44%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 36%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 75%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 84%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 90%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 93%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 67%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 54%
16%
Disability
healthier than 48%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 27%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 29%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
58212
North Dakotashares a border
Score 55.76
Closest healthier
58484
North Dakotashares a border
Score 55.96
Similar health profile
58345
North Dakota99% similar profile
Score 57.87
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 33.9% | 29.7–38.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.3% | 36.3–46.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.7% | 10.5–13.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.7% | 8.4–11.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.6% | 7.5–9.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.8% | 6.4–9.4 |
| Depression among adults | 18.7% | 15.4–22.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.7% | 10.7–15.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.1% | 36.2–46.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.9% | 30.1–48.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.1% | 3.6–4.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 10.4% | 8.2–12.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.6% | 5.1–8.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.9% | 80.0–85.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.7% | 74.9–82.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.8% | 85.8–89.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 69.0% | 63.6–73.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 67.4% | 63.6–70.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.5% | 69.1–84.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.4% | 14.3–21.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.2% | 10.5–16.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.8% | 19.1–29.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.9% | 23.4–36.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 17.5% | 14.6–21.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 12.0% | 10.3–13.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.9% | 11.0–15.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 10.9% | 9.2–12.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 30.3% | 25.5–35.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.2% | 8.9–11.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.0% | 5.9–8.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 14.5% | 12.1–17.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.6% | 3.1–4.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.4% | 3.8–5.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.4% | 16.1–23.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.0% | 7.1–11.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 5.7% | 4.3–7.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 6.8% | 5.5–8.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.1% | 4.3–6.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 26.1% | 21.4–31.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.6% | 3.8–5.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 9.9% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 6.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 26.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 3.9% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.1% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379 |
| Broadband subscription | 80.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 14.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 15.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379 |
| Homeownership rate | 71.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383 |
| Single-parent households | 71.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377 |
| Population 65+ | 32.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 21.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383 |
| Median age | 53.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381 |
| Median household income | $58,438 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354 |
| Median home value | $102,500 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328 |
| Median gross rent | $408 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $767 ($513–$1,222) n=212 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | ND median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.0 yr ± 1.43 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.43 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured