Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58401

in Jamestown, North DakotaPopulation 17,189

52.14/ 100

Ranked #13,263 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #282 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.7 pCi/L

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.9%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

137.3 mi

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST29th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

86 µg/L

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.6%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

21.1 mi

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6.2 ppb

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US93rd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 58401, one of several in Jamestown, North Dakota, on the composite measure, lands in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,263rd) and the bottom 24% of North Dakota (282nd).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: fiber broadband is in the top 2.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 2.1% nationally. Working the other way, modeled disaster risk sits in the top 1.0% nationally, radon registers in the top 3.7% nationally, and expected annual loss lands in the top 4.0% nationally. Lithium in drinking water resides in the top 4.1% nationally, and modeled binge drinking lies in the top 4.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled fine-particle stands in the top 6.9% nationally. Lead in tap water is in the top 7.3% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 58405, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%26.5–32.7
High blood pressure among adults34.4%30.7–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Depression among adults20.7%17.5–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%9.7–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%31.3–39.2
Obesity among adults40.4%34.1–46.9
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.4%11.6–17.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.9–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%75.9–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.9%70.0–77.5
Cholesterol screening among adults82.8%80.7–84.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.9%60.8–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.1%56.3–63.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%69.5–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.6%17.3–24.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%13.7–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%21.7–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.8%25.3–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%16.8–21.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.1–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
Any disability among adults32.0%28.1–36.1
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.6
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.7–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.4–14.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.2–11.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.3–8.3
Loneliness among adults29.4%25.1–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)7.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle7.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription86.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate58.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households66.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+21.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age43.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$60,228$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$215,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$774$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 0.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.97 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured