Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58042

in Harwood, North DakotaPopulation 1,344

62.12/ 100

Ranked #3,452 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.8%)

Ranked #7 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 1.9%)

Ranked #3 of 36 Fargo, ND-MN ZIPs (top 8.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

4.1%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.0%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.1%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.4%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.5%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.8%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.7%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

62%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.0%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Harwood, North Dakota (ZIP 58042) sits in the top 10.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,452nd) and the top 1.9% of North Dakota (7th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled transportation registers in the bottom 1.6% nationally, food insecurity is in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and loneliness lies in the bottom 1.7% nationally. Fatal road crashes registers at the national minimum, modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff lies in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled fine-particle registers in the top 1.5% nationally, and binge drinking is in the top 2.4% nationally. Floodplain exposure lies in the top 2.4% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 3.9% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 58059, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Fargo, ND-MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 1%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 3.0 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 88.0 — 85 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,567 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.8–27.8
High blood pressure among adults30.1%27.3–33.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.7–5.3
Depression among adults22.8%20.1–25.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.4%7.2–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.5–38.3
Obesity among adults33.9%29.8–38.1
Stroke among adults2.4%2.1–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.7%3.7–5.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.4–5.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.6–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%74.4–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.0–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.6%65.4–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.5%72.7–77.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.3%75.3–85.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.5%19.0–24.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%8.3–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.3%12.7–18.0
Short sleep duration among adults28.8%24.9–32.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.0%10.1–14.0
Frequent mental distress among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Frequent physical distress among adults9.6%8.3–11.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.5%8.0–11.0
Any disability among adults20.1%17.3–23.1
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Independent living disability among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Mobility disability among adults8.3%7.0–9.7
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.0–2.7
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.3–3.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.3%15.0–20.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.8–7.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.5%2.6–4.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.7–7.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.4–4.8
Loneliness among adults26.4%23.5–29.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.7%3.1–4.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–640.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)2.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription98.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate98.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households51.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age42.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$137,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$347,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 1.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.11 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured