ZIP code
57652
in Ridgeview, South DakotaPopulation 265
32.74/ 100
Ranked #30,106 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.2%)
Ranked #328 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (bottom 8.9%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Unemployment rate
45.6%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
33%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
88.4%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Walkability
0.11 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
11.1%
in the top 3.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
21.1%
in the top 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Households without a vehicle
35.8%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with no vehicle available.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
20.8%
in the bottom 2.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST2ndUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Crowded housing
15.1%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
14.0%
in the top 4.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›The read
Judged by its overall standing, Ridgeview, South Dakota (ZIP 57652) sits in the bottom 6.2% nationally (30,106th) and the bottom 8.9% of South Dakota (328th).
The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: unemployment resides in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled tooth loss sits in the top 1.8% nationally, and poverty stands in the top 0.4% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 0.5% nationally, modeled vision disability sits in the top 3.1% nationally, and modeled diabetes stands in the top 2.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides in the top 1.8% nationally, and homeownership sits in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Crowded housing stands in the top 2.1% nationally, and modeled independent living disability resides in the top 4.1% nationally.
Placed beside its immediate neighbors, unemployment runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 57442, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 99%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 77%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 7%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 2%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 12%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 2%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 36%
8%
Disability
healthier than 3%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 20%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 98%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 73%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 64%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 2%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 8%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 4%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 7%
8%
Disability
healthier than 3%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
57442
South Dakotashares a border
Score 55.34
Closest healthier
57601
South Dakotashares a border
Score 54.07
Similar health profile
16661
Pennsylvania98% similar profile
Score 38.62
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.3% | 27.0–33.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 41.2% | 37.1–45.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.2% | 6.4–8.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 14.4% | 12.6–16.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.8% | 7.6–10.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.4% | 8.7–12.3 |
| Depression among adults | 21.0% | 17.7–24.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 21.1% | 18.4–23.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.5% | 30.5–38.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 45.1% | 38.4–51.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.8% | 5.1–6.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 33.0% | 28.4–37.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 12.2% | 9.3–15.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 75.3% | 72.1–78.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.2% | 71.1–78.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 81.8% | 79.0–84.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 61.9% | 56.9–66.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 51.2% | 47.4–55.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 70.5% | 62.4–77.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.3% | 13.4–19.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 29.9% | 25.1–34.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 37.0% | 31.5–42.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.2% | 32.5–44.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 30.7% | 26.2–35.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.9% | 17.4–22.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.2% | 16.6–22.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 20.1% | 17.2–23.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 42.1% | 36.9–47.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.0% | 10.5–13.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 14.0% | 11.9–16.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 22.3% | 19.0–25.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.8% | 5.7–7.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 11.1% | 9.5–12.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SD median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 88.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 37.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 9.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 42.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 4.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 45.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365 |
| Households without a vehicle | 35.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364 |
| Broadband subscription | 62.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 20.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 17.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364 |
| Homeownership rate | 20.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 15.1% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367 |
| Single-parent households | 6.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 56.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362 |
| Population 65+ | 2.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367 |
| Median age | 18.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365 |
| Median household income | $19,327 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311 |
| Median gross rent | $463 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $763 ($544–$1,089) n=243 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SD median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 86.4 yr ± 3.36 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.36 years of 86.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured