Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57644

in Meadow, South DakotaPopulation 388

51.16/ 100

Ranked #14,589 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #246 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

0.28 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

31.9 mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

20.7 mi

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

20.8 mi

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.6%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

3.9%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

79.5 mi

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST38th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.1%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

96.6%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST45th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Meadow, South Dakota (ZIP 57644), by its composite score, sits in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,589th) and the bottom 32% of South Dakota (246th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens plainly on what marks this place: walkability settles in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 1.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies in the top 3.1% nationally, and slow internet speeds rests in the top 4.5% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 4.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 5.2% nationally, and modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 6.2% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs.

For anyone unfamiliar, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 57620, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.4–36.3
High blood pressure among adults40.4%36.5–44.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.5–12.9
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%8.7–11.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.1–11.6
Depression among adults20.2%17.4–23.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.5%13.4–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.0–44.1
Obesity among adults37.7%31.0–45.2
Stroke among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.9%12.4–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.3–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.1–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%75.1–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.6–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%63.5–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.5%64.2–70.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%70.8–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.1–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.3%15.2–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%22.8–32.6
Short sleep duration among adults29.1%23.8–34.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.2%18.0–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%12.9–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.2–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.1–16.2
Any disability among adults34.1%29.4–38.9
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.6–10.3
Mobility disability among adults17.1%14.5–20.1
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.0–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6414.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription96.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)3.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate75.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households71.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+30.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$68,229$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$229,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured