Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57344

in Harrison, South DakotaPopulation 39

50.39/ 100

Ranked #15,711 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #261 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

110 mi

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST60th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.7%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST63rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

44.4%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST59th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.3%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Harrison, South Dakota (ZIP 57344) sits in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,711th) and the bottom 28% of South Dakota (261st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled transportation noise lies at the national minimum, distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 3.1% nationally, and fiber broadband stands in the top 5.4% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the bottom 7.5% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled radon registers in the top 2.1% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 5.8% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and slow internet speeds lies in the top 8.9% nationally.

In plain language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 57369, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.1–33.6
High blood pressure among adults37.2%32.7–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.8–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%6.9–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%6.9–10.1
Depression among adults21.0%17.4–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.2–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.0–42.2
Obesity among adults36.5%28.0–45.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.5–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%10.6–16.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%6.7–11.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.0–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.3%73.3–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%83.7–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.0%59.8–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.9%62.1–69.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%67.6–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%14.6–21.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%13.7–20.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%20.2–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults30.3%23.8–37.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.9%15.5–22.7
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%12.9–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%11.7–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%11.5–16.1
Any disability among adults31.4%26.4–36.9
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.7
Independent living disability among adults8.2%6.8–9.6
Mobility disability among adults14.8%12.3–17.7
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.4–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.2–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)10.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription81.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)44.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+76.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age72.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$275,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.7 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 82.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured