Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57330

in Delmont, South DakotaPopulation 594

47.44/ 100

Ranked #19,621 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #290 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.5 pCi/L

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

2.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.7%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

84.2 mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST41st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST53rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

21.8 mi

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.12%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.93%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.3%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Delmont, South Dakota (ZIP 57330) ranks in the bottom 39% nationally (19,621st) and the bottom 19% of South Dakota (290th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled radon rests in the top 0.9% nationally, and walkability stands in the bottom 6.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies in the top 7.2% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lands in the top 9.8% nationally. On the brighter side, recreation sits in the top 1.5% nationally, fiber broadband is in the top 2.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 8.8% nationally.

To spell things out, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 57313, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%27.9–33.5
High blood pressure among adults38.2%34.6–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.7–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.1–10.5
Depression among adults21.7%19.1–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.4–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.3–41.4
Obesity among adults37.4%30.8–43.5
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.1%13.5–19.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.5–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.5–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%74.5–80.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.5–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%64.6–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.5%62.6–68.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%69.9–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.9–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.3%15.9–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%23.1–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%25.7–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.4%17.9–23.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%14.2–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.1–16.7
Any disability among adults33.6%29.6–37.3
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Independent living disability among adults9.2%8.1–10.2
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.2–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6411.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)0.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate86.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households55.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+29.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age40.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$71,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$143,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$618$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured