Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57051

in Oldham, South DakotaPopulation 163

54.37/ 100

Ranked #10,231 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #140 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

100.4 mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST51st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.6%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.7 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST50th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.3%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.8%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

9.5%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

25 µg/L

in the top 38% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US62nd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Oldham, South Dakota (ZIP 57051), by its overall standing, sits in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,231st) and the top 39% of South Dakota (140th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled transportation noise stands at the national minimum, distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 3.6% nationally, and fiber broadband is in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally, homeownership rests in the top 7.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 8.8% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon sits in the top 2.2% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Modeled fine-particle registers in the top 7.6% nationally, and distance to a nursing home stands in the top 10.7% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 57054, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%25.7–32.5
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.2–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.5
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.5–8.8
Depression among adults19.8%16.8–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%10.9–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%33.0–41.8
Obesity among adults36.9%29.4–45.9
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.0%7.3–10.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%6.9–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%75.8–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%73.2–80.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.6–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.1%62.6–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.9%65.6–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%70.2–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%14.9–21.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%12.8–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%20.1–29.6
Short sleep duration among adults28.6%22.9–35.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%14.9–20.7
Frequent mental distress among adults14.3%12.4–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.5–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.2–15.0
Any disability among adults30.5%26.1–35.3
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Mobility disability among adults14.0%11.9–16.2
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)0.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate95.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households81.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+34.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age60.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$56,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$112,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured