Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55325

in Dassel, MinnesotaPopulation 4,795

53.89/ 100

Ranked #10,841 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #416 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

54%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

32.5 mi

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.0%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Dassel, Minnesota (ZIP 55325) ranks in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,841st) and the top 48% of Minnesota (416th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and loneliness lands in the bottom 10.3% nationally. Modeled tooth loss registers in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled arsenic rests in the top 0.5% nationally, distance to a community health center is in the top 3.5% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the top 11.0% nationally. Modeled fine-particle settles in the top 10.1% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking resides in the top 14.9% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, arsenic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 55350, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 18.2; chronic-disease standing 69.0 — 51 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,472 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.6%22.6–28.8
High blood pressure among adults33.8%29.9–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.3–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.7–7.7
Depression among adults23.9%20.5–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.2–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.7%30.8–39.0
Obesity among adults36.6%29.9–43.7
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.0%5.6–8.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.8–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.5–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%72.7–79.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.0–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.8%66.3–74.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.3%64.0–70.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%72.9–84.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%15.5–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.2%12.9–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%21.1–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults29.0%23.8–34.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.7%14.2–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.4–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.8–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.4–14.9
Any disability among adults28.5%24.5–32.8
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Mobility disability among adults13.2%11.3–15.3
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.4–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.5–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.2–9.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.8–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.6–7.4
Loneliness among adults28.5%24.2–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate88.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households61.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+21.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$87,137$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$307,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$851$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured