Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54850

in La Pointe, WisconsinPopulation 321

47.84/ 100

Ranked #19,120 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #657 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 13.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

3.6%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

52 mi

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

83.3%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

11.6 per million

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6.5 ppb

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

US93rd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.7%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.13%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

13.7 mi

in the top 13.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

The read

La Pointe, Wisconsin (ZIP 54850), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 40% nationally (19,120th) and the bottom 13.9% of Wisconsin (657th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: lead in tap water lands in the top 6.8% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease rests in the top 6.5% nationally, and crowded housing settles in the top 9.0% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled pfas lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 0.8% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands in the top 3.7% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk rests in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise lands in the bottom 9.1% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 54806, about 3.1 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.08%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%30.3–37.7
High blood pressure among adults42.2%37.9–46.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.5%9.1–12.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.7%8.6–12.7
Depression among adults24.2%20.8–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.5%14.0–19.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%34.9–43.2
Obesity among adults42.7%35.7–49.5
Stroke among adults5.1%4.4–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.3–17.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%6.6–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.4%80.7–85.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.4–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.2–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.7%64.5–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.3%56.7–63.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%69.1–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.1–17.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.1%14.6–21.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.1%28.4–39.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%26.1–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.3%19.5–27.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.4–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%14.3–19.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%11.9–15.9
Any disability among adults36.1%31.1–41.1
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.1–11.9
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.5–11.6
Mobility disability among adults19.5%16.3–22.9
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.4–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.3–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.6–23.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%11.4–17.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.0%14.2–21.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.4–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.1
Loneliness among adults30.5%26.0–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6414.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)1.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle6.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate89.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population6.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households76.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+45.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age62.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$71,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$278,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$555$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 1.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.73 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured