Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53933

in Fox Lake, WisconsinPopulation 4,227

52.37/ 100

Ranked #12,948 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #458 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

20.6%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.4%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

22.6%

in the top 15.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

0.52%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Fox Lake, Wisconsin (ZIP 53933) lands in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,948th) and the bottom 40% of Wisconsin (458th).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: modeled mammography lands in the top 12.9% nationally, unemployment lies in the bottom 16% nationally, and modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 18% nationally. Modeled pfas rests in the bottom 22% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking registers in the top 4.2% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled obesity settles in the top 3.8% nationally, and radon is in the top 12.3% nationally. Floodplain exposure sits in the top 15.0% nationally. Childcare lands at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

Against the wider neighborhood, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. On the overall standing, ZIP 53916, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.4–28.0
High blood pressure among adults34.0%30.3–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.8–8.3
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Depression among adults20.8%17.8–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.9–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%31.2–38.7
Obesity among adults45.4%38.9–51.6
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.4–13.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.0–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%71.7–77.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.1%73.6–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.0%81.8–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%61.7–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.0%59.6–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.7%73.6–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.6%17.3–24.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%13.9–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.5%24.3–33.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%32.1–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.0%16.4–21.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%14.0–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.6–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%12.0–15.5
Any disability among adults30.9%27.0–35.1
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Mobility disability among adults13.0%11.4–15.0
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.4%20.2–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.0–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.1–17.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.2–14.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Loneliness among adults30.2%25.9–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.0–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)0.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate71.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households53.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+17.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$83,578$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$261,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,251$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured