Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53826

in Wauzeka, WisconsinPopulation 1,323

46.99/ 100

Ranked #20,169 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #689 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 9.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

6.8%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.1%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

39.6 mi

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

8.4 days/year

in the top 39% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US61st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

Wauzeka, Wisconsin (ZIP 53826), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 37% nationally (20,169th) and the bottom 9.7% of Wisconsin (689th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled pfas resides in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 19% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking lies in the top 4.8% nationally, slow internet speeds sits in the top 10.2% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Modeled radon registers in the top 17% nationally. Recreation stands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians lands at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity is in the top 19% nationally. Childcare resides at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 53805, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%28.6–33.0
High blood pressure among adults36.8%34.7–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.8–10.1
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.9–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.4–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Depression among adults26.3%24.2–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%12.1–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%34.7–40.2
Obesity among adults40.8%36.9–46.8
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%10.6–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%7.1–10.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%78.5–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%76.1–80.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%84.0–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%63.3–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.7%61.0–68.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%70.2–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%18.6–23.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.8–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.5%27.5–34.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%28.1–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.0%18.9–23.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.4–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%14.0–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.7–16.9
Any disability among adults33.9%31.0–37.5
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.8–9.3
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.3
Mobility disability among adults15.8%14.3–17.7
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%17.4–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.6–15.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.3%11.8–16.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.2–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.2
Loneliness among adults30.8%25.9–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.9–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription84.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate79.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households59.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+17.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$73,438$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$173,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$690$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured